Analisis Konflik Commognitive Dalam Collaborative Problem Solving

Authors

  • Mutiara Nursandi Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai
  • Zulfah Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai
  • Kasman Edi Putra Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37150/jp.v8i2.3503

Keywords:

Analysis, Collaborative Problem Solving, Commognitive Conflict

Abstract

This study aims to analyze commognitive conflict in collaborative problem solving in high, medium, and low category subjects. The type of research used in this study is descriptive qualitative research. The place where this research was conducted was at SMA Negeri 1 Kuok. The subjects in this study were students of class XI IPA SMA Negeri 1 Kuok, consisting of six students with a purposive sampling technique. The data analysis techniques used in this study were data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions/verification. After the data was analyzed, the data was validated using triangulation techniques, namely by comparing the results of students' diagnostic test answers to test questions and interview results with the subjects. From the results of the analysis that had been carried out, it was found that commognitive conflict in collaborative problem solving in high ability subjects was minimal. While in ability subjects, commognitive conflict in collaborative problem solving occurred, but not in all commognitive indicators. However, in low category subjects, commognitive conflict occurred in almost all indicators. Factors that cause commognitive conflict in collaborative problem solving are due to internal factors such as the subject not being used to reading questions, the subject does not understand the contents of the question, the subject does not know the formula or solution strategy in solving the question, is not careful in working on the question, etc.

References

Agustin, D. R., & Rokhmawati, A. (2023). Commognitive Kesalahan Mahasiswa Melalui Aktivitas Diskusi dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.31316/jderivat.v10i3.5061

Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in Education Environments. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209204

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. In Research Methods in Physical Activity and Health. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158501-17

Emanuel, E. P. L., Nusantara, T., Rahman, A., & Rahardi, R. (2023). Why am I confused ? Commognitive Conflict in Non-ordinary Question About Number Division. Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6, 891–901.

Greenstein, L. (2012). A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic learning. A Sage Company.

Hanan, M. P., & Alim, J. A. (2023). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar Pada Materi Geometri. Al-Irsyad Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.58917/ijme.v2i2.64

Jaesool, K., Gyoungho, L., Sang Suk, P., Jung Whan, Ki., Hyeok Gu, K., & Hac Kyoo, P. (2010). Development of an Instrument for Measuring Cognitive Conflict in Secondary Level Science Classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099

Laar, E. van, Deursen, A. van, Dijk, J. van, & Haan, J. de. (2017). The Relation Between 21st-Century Skills and Digital Skills : A systematic Literature Review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

OECD. (2015). Field Trial Cognitive Items. OECD Programme for International Student Assessment 2015, 1–89.

OECD. (2017). Collaborative Problem-solving: Vol. V. PISA 2015 Result.

Pratiwi, E., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, & Muksar, M. (2020a). Konflik Kognitif Tekstual dan Kontekstual Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Pecahan yang Tidak Tepat. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmuwan Muda Berbakat, 8(2), 731–742.

Pratiwi, E., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., & Muksar, M. (2020b). Textual and contextual commognitive conflict students in solving an improper fraction. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.678528

Putut Laksminto Emanuel, E., & Meilantifa, M. (2022). Dimanakah Nilai Ekstrim Fungsi Kuadrat Ditinjau dari Lensa Commognitive? Briliant : Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 7(2), 269. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v7i2.808

Rachmayani, A. N. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.

Rossydha, F., Nusantara, T., & Sukoriyanto, S. (2021). Commognitive Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Persamaan Linier Satu Variabel. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i1.14367

Ryve, A., Nilsson, P., & Pettersson, K. (2013). Analyzing Effective Communication in Mathematics Group Work : The Role of Visual Mediators and Technical Terms. Educational Studies in Mathematics.

Setyowati, S., Purwanto, & Sudirman. (2022). Analisis Commognitive Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Lingkaran Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 06(02), 2336–2351.

Sfard, A., & Avigail, S. (2014). When the Rules of Discourse Change, but Nobody Tells You : Making Sense of Mathematics Learning From a Commognitive Standpoint. In Journal of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 16, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253

Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2016). Thinking as Communicating : Human Development, the Growth of Discourses and Mathematizing. In Thinking as Communicating : Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944

Warda, Nurul; Alim, A. E. (2024). Deskripsi Commognitive Siswa Kelas Viii Dalam Memahami Materi Lingkaran Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Di Smp. 10, 1–23.

Wulandari. (2023). Analisis Kebutuhan Media Video Pembelajaran Inovatif Berbasis Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Di SMAN 8 Denpasar. eprints.unmas.ac.id.

Zhang, Y., Lu, J., & Li, Y. (2023). Visual Analysis of Commognitive Conflict in Collaborative Problem Solving in Classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(December), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216652

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31